Miscreant Theatre

November 25, 2010

The 1.5 minute acting class

Filed under: The Miscreant Blog — admin @ 3:37 am

This clip of Bill O’rielly was a YouTube sensation last year. I’ve watched it at least 50 times. It’s hysterical.

Watch the clip a few times so you know what I’m talking about….

As I’ve gone back to this video many times, I’ve started to key in to the finer points of the video.  Specifically Oreilly’s emotional journey through the one and a half minutes.

Historically what we have come to accept as good acting has grown smaller and more subtle over time. Certainly film, and even more so, television are at the heart of this diminishment. And as a result, we think that only extraordinarily rich texts like Shakespeare and the Greeks can hold big broad emotion.   This sentiment, however, is the polar opposite of what has become Miscreant’s acting style/approach. (I’m not big on limiting to a certain “approach”, but for the purposes of this post I’ll use this terminology.)

Jacob and my acting teacher at Yale, Peter Francis James, who worked with us on Shakespeare, has a term that he uses, which is at the core of his approach to the text: “Change with the Changes.”  Shakespeare’s language is wonderfully dynamic; often taking any number of turns and shifts throughout a single thought. The language comes to life when the actor fully attacks these changes, without pausing to have a moment to “think about” the coming change. Hence “Change with the Changes.”

It is Jacob and my belief, which we believe is supported through Miscreant’s body of work, that this approach makes for exciting theatre, regardless of the text; Shakespeare, Chekhov, or a contemporary piece.

Take another look at Mr. Orielly and pay attention to the emotions that he goes through in a very short amount of time:
Confusion to
Annoyance to
Anger to
Perplexed to
Embarrassment to
Hurried to
Furious to
Completely unhinged to
Controlled to
Irate.

I’d say that’s a pretty good run of emotions for a 90 second span of time. And think about the text. There’s nothing special about it. No great reverence attached to this grouping of words. Yet, it holds the emotion. Because TRUTH HAS NO SIZE!

If it’s personalized and truthful any text will hold big choices, bold choice, and huge emotions.  And the changes can happen faster than we think.

Thank you Mr. O’reilly for this wonderful teaching tool. We will do it live.

October 29, 2010

The Frustration Of Trying Too Hard

Filed under: Past Productions — admin @ 2:43 am

When I was in Boston a few years ago, doing a show at the Huntington, I joined a boxing gym to work out at.  I was there three months and boxed for the last two.  I had no aspirations to be a boxer; I was just looking for something different from my usual gym routine.  I got exactly what I was looking for.  Boxing training is fantastic.  I very quickly came to enjoy the physical and mental battles that you fight wile training.

Fast-forward four years.  I haven’t boxed since.  But I kept my gear and it’s one of things that floats around in the “need to do that” file in the back of my head.

I recently found myself in the same position I was in leading up to Boston; I needed a change from my weekly gym routine.  So I grabbed my gear and signed up for a month at Gleason’s Gym in Brooklyn.  Gleason’s is the real deal.  There’s nothing glamorous about the facility; except for its tradition and the “world champion” banners that hang around the gym.  And they are plentiful.  Gleason’s has had many great fighters drop blood and sweat on it’s floor.

I got a trainer to work with me for the month; Martine.  Martine is a fun loving, no bullshit, pit-bull of a man.  His hands are like bricks.  He’s got professional trainers moving up in the ranks who he works with throughout the day.  He trains them hard and treats me no different.

Martine focuses on technical proficiency and hitting hard.  As we were working today, I was reminded, repeatedly, of the frustration of trying too hard.  This is something I encountered heavily through my first two years of grad school. (I had a breakthrough going into my third year that helped me overcome that.  That’s another story.)  For me, trying too hard is the result if trying to do something right. The ‘trying’ then manifests itself in tension and holding.  Both of which are death for the actor and boxer.

So here I am, hitting the mitts with Martine.  ”Relax, relax, relax” he tells me over and over again.  He gives me some adjustments in my stance and tells me to stop leaning in to the punches.  ”Turn the body, not lean.”  I take his advice and TRY to implement it.  I get tight, trying to hold my feet in proper position while holding my body back to prevent the leaning.  This gets an immediate response of “relax, relax, relax.”

My internal frustration is building as I ask myself “how can I hit hard and relax at the same time?  How can I prevent leaning forward without holding?”  Martine continues, “relax, relax, relax.”  I’m growing more furious with each “relax” that comes out of his mouth.  The, something clicks in my head and I tell myself “fuck it.”  I immediately drop my shoulders, move with fluidity, and throw a left, right that pops the mitts and makes Martine’s eye widen.  He steps back for a second, says “thank you” and then “one, two.”  TRYING to replicate what I just did, I tense up, holding on to the past and throw a left, right that gets a quick “relax, relax, relax.”  And that quickly it’s gone and I’m searching again.

Later, when I was left to the solitude of jumping rope, my mind was racing: How can I relax and work technically and hit hard?  I don’t have an answer, but I have the feeling of doing it for a few fleeting punches here and there.  It is possible to hit hard and be relaxed while doing it.  In fact it’s necessary.

As I was jumping away my mind made the association to the feeling I had during the first two years of grad school.  That frustration of trying to implement an acting note.  Similarly, this TRYING was met with a similar response: “more ease, more ease.”  Like the boxer, how does the actor do something without the tension that comes with TRYING to do it?  And for me, again, the solution is “fuck it.”

Maybe tomorrow when I’m jumping rope I’ll find some inspiration to articulate what “fuck it” means.


JB

September 3, 2010

Why Zach Galifianakis is an exceptional actor

Filed under: The Miscreant Blog — admin @ 10:56 am

So I went and saw The American last night and there was a preview for Its A Funny Story, one of a couple movies that Zach Galifianakas has coming out this fall.  The movie looks good in a cute and funny way.  But, as usual with his work, I couldn’t take my eyes off of ZG when he was on the screen.  He’s been on my mind of late, as I’ve been watching Bored To Death on HBO.  I’m not a big fan of the show, I think Jason Schwartzman struggles in the lead part, but ZG is reason enough to watch it.

As I was having a sandwich after the movie I was thinking: Why is ZG so watchable? Why is he such a good actor?  On another level, I thought why am I even thinking about this?  He’s not the type of actor I usually like to watch; there’s no transformation, he’s always funny, and usually always playing the same role - himself.  But still, I love watching the guy.  Why?  The answer is this:  He always plays with high stakes.  Everything is life and death to a ZG character.  Unlike other ‘funny actors’ Galifianakis doesn’t play at being funny. His humor comes from the need of his characters, and always being in a life and death situation, even when he’s talking about a something as mundane as sumer school.

I don’t think Galifianakis has had any training.  (He seems to have found his own way, using his odd view of the world and youtube to catapult his way to stardom.)  But somehow he learned to play everything very serious, deadly so.  And from that commitment, in an unusually odd situation, humor springs to life.

I think Galifianakis is a great case study for any actor.  He’s a self-made man; he’s not some pretty boy whose father was in the business, or anything like that.  And his work is fantastic; every actor needs that same level of commitment in pursuing their characters need.

JB

August 31, 2010

Performing in a Smash and Grab vs. a traditional process

Filed under: Past Productions — admin @ 10:36 am

I had the unique opportunity to go from the Cherry Orchard Smash and Grab straight into a shakespeare play at a regional theatre.  It gave me a great amount of perspective jumping from the chaos of the Smash and Grab into the precision of Shakespeare.

For me, the greatest lesson created in the friction between the two was this:  The structure of Shakespeare’s language can hold the recklessness of the Smash and Grab acting style.  In fact, I think it needs it.  Meaning, if you fall into the rigidity of the language, you’re dead.  The actor needs to have invested in that language, and needs to have done his homework, but he also needs to have the playfulness and the spontaneity of the Smash and Grab.

This realization manifested itself this way:  I don’t get very nervous before shows.  I get the occasional butterfly, but I believe that if you’ve prepared and given everything you have to the rehearsal process, you have nothing to be nervous about.  So, given that I will get the occasional butterfly going into a traditional performance, I was expecting to be infinitely more nervous going into performances for the Smash and Grab.  As it turned out, I wasn’t nervous at all.  Not in the least bit.  And I realized why, as I stood in the wings waiting for my first entrance into the first performance of Romeo and Juliet.  In a Smash and Grab, there is nothing to get right and therefore, more importantly, NOTHING TO GET WRONG.  No marks to miss.  No blocking to forget.  No timing that has been worked out….

It is here that the Smash and Grab attitude can have it’s greatest effect on a traditional process: there must be nothing to ‘get wrong’ in any performance.  Even though you’ve spent three weeks as a company painstakingly working everything out, there can be no fear of messing it up.  And this can only happen when the group agrees to it as a whole.  So that there’s no conversation afterward about “I missed that” or “You forgot the letter” or anything along those lines.  What ever happens is a gift.  An adventure to be had by both the actors and the audience.

Now, everyone says this going into production, but they never work on it, and they never try and find a group mindset to allow it.  This will be a goal when I direct Bridesburg in the spring.  I’m not sure how to go about it, but it must be found.  Lets have an adventure….


JB

August 27, 2010

It’s not Tuesday…

Filed under: The Miscreant Blog — admin @ 6:17 pm

But I decided to blog anyway.  I know, I know… “you were the Tuesday blogger!  What makes you think you can handle Friday?”

I can’t, really.  What I can do is tell you David’s play is coming up in November.   I even actually read this one and I can tell you it is an awesome piece of work.  Nugent’s characters are real and their stories are full of comedy and poignant (athough sometimes heartbreaking) naturalism.  You live with these people and you ache for them.  I can’t wait until we get into production.

Other than that, happy pre-labor day weekend!  We Miscreants always like to celebrate a meaningless holiday like “Labor Day” a week before it actually happens.  We have similar festivities the week before Arbor Day and Jeff’s birthday.

So, happy pre-labor day weekend!

-BLT

Older Posts »
What's In The Pipeline Support Us Get Tickets

88 East 3rd St. Suite 8 • New York, NY 10003 • 212.479.0806